One grew revenue 50x after half his team quit over the strategy. One brought in 50K signups in a single day with no paid budget. One generated 100M+ views from a stunt that took 50 hours to conceive. One asked every prospect to demo the product themselves instead of demoing it for them.

None of them followed the safe playbook. They treated GTM like an experiment, moved before they had proof, and made bets most founders would never get approved.

HubSpot for Startups documented all 6 stories in the free Bold Bets Playbook. The risks they took, why it was risky, and what it returned.

Read the free Bold Bets Playbook

If you’re new, not yet a subscriber, or just plain missed it, here are some of our recent editions.

_{Interested in sponsoring these emails? See our partnership options here.}

Subscribe to the Life Self Mastery podcast, which guides you on getting funding and allowing your business to grow rocketship. 

Previous guests include Guy Kawasaki, Brad Feld, James Clear, Nick Huber, Shu Nyatta and 350+ incredible guests.

This week, Entrata filed to go public on the NYSE under ENT. The headline numbers will carry the coverage. Revenue of $509M in 2025, up 24%. A Q1 run-rate near $574M. GAAP net income of $50.7M — real profit, not adjusted. 117% net revenue retention, flat two years running. Gross margins of 60%, rising to 63%, even with payments running through the top line. Rule of 40 around 47.

One of the cleanest software P&Ls to file in years. It is also the wrong story.

Read the growth rate and the problem appears. 23%, flat with last year. The market has stopped paying for efficient growth. It pays for acceleration — Snowflake and Datadog reaccelerated and got rewarded; Zscaler and HubSpot beat last quarter and still got cut.

So the question the S-1 raises is not whether Entrata is profitable. It is what ~$2.5B to $3B is paying for — the 23% business that filed, or one that reaccelerates.

For most of the past year, the story has been that software is dead. AI is the only thing investors want to hear about — OpenAI, Anthropic, SpaceX, the IPOs that haven't filed and may never need to. Meanwhile a backlog of "pretty good" software companies has been stacking up behind the window, some waiting two, three, five years for a way out.

This week, one of them moved. Entrata filed to go public on the NYSE under ENT.

It is not the company anyone had on their list. Property management software, founded in Utah 23 years ago, scaled with almost no venture capital. Not a hot AI name. Not a rocket ship. $509M in revenue, growing 23%, GAAP profitable, 117% net retention that hasn't moved in two years.

And that is exactly why it matters. Entrata is not the start of the floodgates. It is the test the floodgates are waiting on — the first PE-backed software business to find out what the public market will actually pay for efficient, durable, un-accelerating growth.

Hundreds of private companies are about to read the result very carefully. So let's dig into the numbers.

Entrata was founded in Utah 23 years ago, when vertical software was far less fashionable than it is now. It scaled almost entirely without venture capital — two tiny early rounds in 2005 and 2006, then nothing institutional for fifteen years.

The story turns strange in 2018. Founder Dave Bateman went to a magic mushroom retreat and decided he was done running the company. He kept his equity, handed the day-to-day to a new CEO, and stepped back.

Then the capital arrived. Silver Lake led a $507M round in 2021 — the largest private raise in Utah history — much of it buying out early holders rather than funding growth.

In early 2022, Bateman sent a conspiracy-laden, racist email to prominent Utah figures. He was removed from the board and forced to sell 100% of his stake to Silver Lake, which became majority owner.

In May 2025, Blackstone invested $200M at a $4.3B valuation.

Every S-1 buries the real risks in legal language. Entrata's are worth reading closely.

The first is switching cost in reverse. Legacy systems — Yardi, RealPage, MRI — are deeply embedded in owners and operators. That moat protects incumbents, and Entrata is not the incumbent everywhere it sells. The thing that makes its own 117% NRR durable makes new logos slow.

The second is hidden in the contract terms. Customers sign three- to five-year deals with no obligation to renew, and any single property can be terminated without penalty if it changes owner or operator. Entrata does not control who buys or sells a building. So some churn arrives for reasons that have nothing to do with the product.

The third is the payments line. Entrata requires subscribers to use its payment solution, which is why payments run through revenue. That is the margin story working — and the exposure. Chargebacks, fraud, ODFI limits, and card-network repricing all land on Entrata.

The fourth is AI, framed as upside everywhere else in the filing. Here it is the defeater: competitors using AI to close the product gap faster than Entrata can widen it.

The market opportunity reads big, and most coverage will stop at the number. Entrata manages roughly 2.5M units — about 10% of US multifamily. The easy story is the 90% still open.

That framing misses what the S-1 actually describes. Entrata is not selling into greenfield. It is selling into a market where Yardi, RealPage, and MRI are already installed and deeply embedded. The 90% is not unclaimed. It is held.

So the real opportunity is not penetration. It is the land-and-expand mechanic underneath it. Add units as customers build or acquire. Layer more products onto each unit — payments, screening, insurance, leasing, maintenance. The unit count is the floor; revenue per unit is the lever.

That is what 117% NRR has been quietly proving for two years. Existing customers keep buying more, even when they don't add buildings.

And it is why payments matter beyond margin. Requiring subscribers to route payments through Entrata turns every unit into a transaction stream, not just a subscription line.

The opportunity isn't 25M units waiting to be sold. It is one operating system getting wider inside the units it already runs.

Most property software is a point solution — accounting, or leasing, or screening, or payments. Entrata's claim is that it is the layer underneath all of them. One system that runs accounting, property operations, leasing, CRM, marketing, maintenance, resident screening, utilities, reporting, vendor and rent payments, renters insurance, deposit alternatives, resident rewards, revenue management, and amenity booking.

That is not a feature list. It is a wedge against the point-solution market the filing names as a competitor — the spreadsheets, the bolt-ons, the bespoke in-house tools. The pitch is consolidation: stop stitching ten vendors together and run the building on one.

Payments is the piece that makes it more than a suite. Entrata requires subscribers to use its payment solution, so every rent check and vendor payment flows through the system. That is what keeps gross margins at software levels even with payments in revenue — and what makes the platform hard to unwind once it's in.

Then there's ELI, the agentic layer. That's the credible AI story: not a chatbot bolted on, but automation sitting on top of the workflows Entrata already owns.

Entrata's business model has two engines, and the second one is why the margins work.

The first is subscriptions. Customers sign three- to five-year deals priced on units — the more buildings on the Operating System, the larger the contract. This is the recurring base, and it's where the 117% NRR shows up: customers expand by adding units and layering on products.

The second is payments, and it's not a side line. Entrata requires every subscriber to route payments through its own solution. So rent and vendor payments flow through the top line, and payment processing fees sit alongside the subscription fee on every unit.

That requirement is the whole design. It turns each unit into two revenue streams instead of one, and it ties the two together — you can't take the subscription without the payments. The filing says as much: the integration compounds the impact of renewal and expansion.

The number that proves it: 60% gross margin, rising to 63%. Payments businesses like Toast trade under 2x revenue because payments carry thin margins. Entrata runs payments through revenue and still posts software margins.

Not a SaaS business with payments attached. A payments business wearing software margins — because the software makes the payments mandatory.

Adam Edmunds — Chief Executive Officer

Adam Edmunds has served as CEO since December 2020, brought in to run Entrata after founder Dave Bateman stepped back. He led the effort to raise $507M from Silver Lake, Dragoneer, Ryan Smith, and Todd Pedersen in July 2021 — the first institutional round in Entrata's history and the largest private equity round in Utah history. Before Entrata, he was President of Podium, where he helped grow the company from $1M to over $100M in ARR in four years. Earlier, he founded Allegiance (acquired by MaritzCX in 2014) and, as a college student, SilentWhistle (acquired in 2009). He holds a Master's in Accounting from BYU.

Mark Hansen — Chief Financial Officer

Mark Hansen serves as CFO, overseeing the finance organization through the IPO process.

Jason Taylor — Chief Technology Officer

Jason Taylor serves as CTO, leading engineering and the technology stack behind the Operating System, including the ELI agentic layer.

Entrata's cap table reads short and concentrated. Silver Lake holds majority control. Blackstone sits behind it at the $4.3B mark from May 2025. There are no early-stage VCs to name, because there were never any — two tiny rounds in 2005–2006 raised a few hundred thousand dollars, and the founder's stake was bought out years ago.

The valuation trajectory frames the question. Silver Lake's 2021 round priced Entrata near an estimated $1.5B. Blackstone's 2025 round marked it to $4.3B — nearly a triple in four years, even as the average public cloud stock fell ~30% over the same stretch. The IPO is expected to land at roughly $2.5B to $3.0B in equity value, on software comps of 4.5x to 5.5x.

So the question the cap table raises is not whether Entrata can raise money. The PE capital is already in, and already wants out. It is whether the public market will pay what the last private round did — or mark Blackstone's $4.3B back down to what a 23%-growth business clears today.

Entrata names its competition in four tiers, and the order matters.

At the top sit the legacy incumbents — Yardi, RealPage, MRI, AMSI. These are the deeply embedded systems Entrata sells against, the ones already running the buildings it wants. Below them, the SMB-focused players: AppFolio, plus Buildium, Propertyware, and Yardi Breeze. Then the point solutions — single-workflow tools that pick off one slice of the stack. And finally the quiet giant: the status quo of spreadsheets, email, paper checks, and in-house systems.

The filing's own framing is the tell. Entrata isn't fighting one competitor. It's fighting an installed base. The same embedding that gives Entrata 117% NRR protects everyone else's incumbents too. That cuts both ways.

The sharper risk is buried near the end. Larger competitors can bundle, cross-subsidize, and sell at zero or negative margins to keep Entrata out. And AI is named explicitly as a defeater — rivals using it to close the product gap faster than Entrata can widen it.

So the competitive set isn't really Yardi versus Entrata. It's whether a consolidated Operating System wins against a market that already paid to install something else — and whether AI lets the next entrant skip the 23 years it took Entrata to get here.

This week Entrata filed to go public on the NYSE (ENT). Property management software, built in Utah over 23 years with almost no venture capital. Not an AI name. That is exactly why it matters.

The history is strange. Founder Dave Bateman stepped back after a 2018 mushroom retreat, then was forced out in 2022 over a racist email and made to sell his entire stake. Silver Lake took control in 2021 near $1.5B. Blackstone marked it to $4.3B in May 2025.

The business is clean. $509M revenue in 2025, up 24%. GAAP net income of $50.7M. Gross margins of 60%, rising to 63% — software margins, with payments running through the top line because every subscriber is required to use Entrata's payment rail. 117% NRR, flat two years. Rule of 40 around 47.

The opportunity is not the 90% of US multifamily still open. That is held by Yardi and RealPage. It is land-and-expand: more products per unit, payments on every unit.

What is it worth? Not the discount everyone expects. Strip out Toast and the software comps cluster at 5.5x revenue. But the 2025 recap left ~$400M of debt the equity buyer inherits. At $2.5B equity that is 5.7x; at $3.0B, 6.7x. Load the debt and dock it for the 60% margin, and Entrata prices in line with its peers, not below them. Fair band: $2.1B to $3.0B.

The tension: Blackstone bought at $4.3B and is underwater at any realistic IPO price. Silver Lake is fine.

Good business. Wrong side of the bar the market is using — it pays for acceleration, and Entrata's 24% is flat. The hundreds of PE-backed companies behind it are watching the multiple after the debt.

Entrata's financials are the rare kind in vertical software right now: efficient growth and real profit at the same time. Revenue grew to $509M in 2025, up 24%, with Q1 2026 running $143.5M — a ~$574M run-rate. The company is GAAP net income positive, $50.7M in 2025 and a 16% net margin in Q1. Not adjusted profit. Real profit.

The number that does not behave like a payments business is the gross margin. 60% for 2025, climbing to 63% in Q1 2026, up from 54% two years earlier. Payments companies live in the 20s and 30s — Toast trades under 2x revenue for exactly that reason. Entrata runs payments through its top line and still posts software margins.

What makes it remarkable is the direction. Margins climbed nine points in two years, even as payments — the lower-margin line — grew alongside subscriptions. Product mix did the work: higher-margin attach, more products per unit, the land-and-expand mechanic compounding. The durability backs it. 117% NRR, flat two years running. 97% gross retention. Rule of 40 around 47.

So the financials are not the problem they will be framed as. The base business is genuinely profitable, genuinely durable. The question is the top line: 23% growth, flat with last year. Every other metric argues for a premium.

Entrata files one of the cleanest software records to reach the public market in years. Profitable, 60% gross margins, 117% NRR that hasn't moved in two years. The filing is also a test the company didn't ask to run.

The bull case: this is durable software, mispriced by an AI-obsessed market. 23 years of compounding retention, an Operating System that gets wider inside every unit it runs, payments locking customers in, and ELI as a credible AI layer. At ~$2.5B–$3B, a solid business bought cheap because nobody's looking.

The bear case: the growth is the whole story. 23%, flat with last year, into an installed base the incumbents already own. The market has stopped paying for efficient growth — Zscaler and HubSpot beat and still got cut. Blackstone marked it at $4.3B; the public market may mark it back down.

Oscar Rubio is the founder and CEO of Lodgerin, the first digital ecosystem simplifying international mobility by connecting organizations with housing providers and personalized services.

If you enjoyed our analysis, we’d very much appreciate you sharing with a friend.

Here are the options I have for us to work together. If any of them are interesting to you - hit me up!

What do you think about my bi-weekly Newsletter? Love it | Okay-ish | Stop it