Imagine turning down Uber at a valuation of $10 million, only to watch it go public at over $80 billion.

That’s exactly what happened to Mark Cuban… a 799,900% return, gone.

But original Shark Tank investor Kevin Harrington built his career doing the opposite: spotting asymmetric opportunities before they go mainstream.

Like Uber turned vehicles into income-generating assets, Mode Mobile is turning smartphones into income streams.

They were named the #1 fastest-growing software company by Deloitte and have already helped their users earn and save over $1B.

Kevin Harrington invested early.

And at just $0.52/share, you can still get in before their potential IPO.

Secure shares at $0.52 while the pre-IPO window is still open.

^{Potential Uber return for Marc Cuban does not take into account dilution.}

^{The Deloitte rankings are based on submitted applications and public company database research, with winners selected based on their fiscal-year revenue growth percentage over a three-year period in 2023.}

^{Please read the offering circular at invest.modemobile.com. This is a paid advertisement for Mode Mobile’s Regulation A Offering.}

If you’re new, not yet a subscriber, or just plain missed it, here are some of our recent editions.

_{Interested in sponsoring these emails? See our partnership options here.}

Subscribe to the Life Self Mastery podcast, which guides you on getting funding and allowing your business to grow rocketship. 

Previous guests include Guy Kawasaki, Brad Feld, James Clear, Nick Huber, Shu Nyatta and 350+ incredible guests.

Lime files to go public on the Nasdaq under LIME this week. The valuation lands around $1.8B, on revenue of $886.7M in 2025, up from $522.0M in 2023. Adjusted EBITDA of $218.1M, up from $99.8M two years ago. Operating income flipped from a $24.6M loss to $70.4M positive over the same stretch. Marketing spend under 2% of revenue.

A scooter network that finally pays for itself, disclosed cleanly. It is also not the full story.

Net loss still widened to $59.3M, almost entirely a non-cash mark on convertible notes that disappear into common stock the day this prices. $821M of debt sits on the balance sheet today, with $115M due in cash this September — the reason the filing says survival depends on the IPO closing. Underneath the operational turnaround sits a 2020 near-death, an Uber bailout, and two cities (Madrid, Paris) that already voted the whole industry off their streets.

So the question the S-1 raises isn't whether the operating business works now. It's whether 230 city governments keep agreeing to let it.

For the past few weeks, the story has been that the IPO market is finally back open. Strong equity markets, blockbuster debuts, and issuers who'd been waiting on the sidelines are pushing ahead with their plans.

This week, a scooter company that nearly died in 2020 is testing whether that appetite extends to it. Lime, listing on the Nasdaq under LIME.

It is not a hard company to picture. You've stepped over its scooters on a sidewalk, maybe even ridden one. Founded in 2017, run by former Uber chief of staff Wayne Ting since an emergency $85 million check from Uber kept it alive through COVID. It now operates in roughly 230 cities across 29 countries, the largest shared micromobility company in the world by a wide margin. Revenue went from $522.0M in 2023 to $886.7M in 2025. Operating income flipped from a $24.6M loss to $70.4M of income over that stretch. Net loss still widened to $59.3M, almost entirely a non-cash accounting charge tied to convertible debt that converts to stock the day this prices.

And that is exactly why it matters. Lime is not a growth story asking for a premium multiple. It is an operational turnaround asking the public market to underwrite whether scooters, permits, and city governments can be a durable business at all.

Lime started in 2017, one of a wave of dockless scooter startups that flooded city sidewalks almost overnight. The early years were a land grab — cheap capital, aggressive expansion, and competitors matching each other dollar for dollar to claim cities before the other guy did.

Then COVID hit. Revenue dropped roughly 95% in days, and Lime's six months of runway turned into twenty. Uber stepped in with an $85 million check in early 2020, and elevated Wayne Ting, then Head of Strategy and Ops, to CEO. The venture money that had funded the entire category fled, and competitors like Bird never recovered.

What followed was a multi-year operational rebuild: swappable batteries instead of warehouse charging, scoreboards for every warehouse GM, fleet decay rates that went from a new scooter every 30 days to one lasting five years. Operating losses of $24.6M in 2023 became $70.4M of income in 2025. The IPO is the moment that turnaround meets a balance sheet still carrying its COVID-era debt.

Every S-1 risk section is boilerplate. This one has a few lines that are not.

Start with the permits. Lime doesn't own the streets it operates on; it rents access one city at a time, and the filing says cities can revoke that access with or without cause. It already happened twice. Madrid pulled every e-scooter operator's permit in 2024. Paris held a referendum in 2023 and voted the entire industry out. Lime didn't lose those cities to a competitor. It lost them to a vote.

Run the numbers and Madrid alone doesn't move much. Lime's license there was capped at 2,000 scooters, and at industry-typical revenue per vehicle, that's roughly $6 to $10 million a year, under 1.2% of 2025 revenue even at the high end. The real exposure isn't any single city. It's the pattern: Madrid in 2024, Paris in 2023, Prague restricting scooter parking outright in 2025. Three capitals in three years, each individually a rounding error, each one a data point in the same direction. The filing's own language admits this risk is "heightened in our concentrated markets where we generate a disproportionate share of our revenue."

Then the going concern line. Buried in the risk factors: Lime's ability to continue operating depends on this IPO actually closing. Not growing faster, not cutting costs — closing the deal. If it doesn't, the company is negotiating with noteholders or hunting for emergency financing, the same position it was in back in 2020.

The quieter one is also the more honest one once you run the math: the depreciation change. Effective January 1, 2025, Lime switched how it depreciates scooters, from usage-based to straight-line, calling it a more accurate reflection of asset life. Defensible on paper. But back-solving from the company's own Adjusted Gross Profit disclosures, the switch didn't flatter 2025. Depreciation as a share of revenue actually rose, from roughly 12.7% to 13.7%, a headwind of about 100 basis points, consistent with reported gross margin slipping from 40.9% to 39.0%. If there's a tailwind here at all, it's not in the numbers being reported now. It's in the years ahead, once a fixed depreciation schedule stops scaling with a fleet that keeps getting used harder.

Lime calls itself early innings of a multi-decade opportunity, and the market sizing is built to match. SAM today is $6.1 billion, based on roughly 15% adoption among addressable riders in its existing cities. Push that to the 30 to 40% adoption Lime already sees in its most mature markets, and the same footprint becomes a $12.0 billion opportunity, just from riders catching up to where the best cities already are.

Then the aperture widens. Add the cities Lime has identified as expansion targets over the next five years, hold adoption at 30%, and the number becomes $22.0 billion. Assume full adoption across that expanded map and you get the headline figure: a $69.1 billion TAM.

That's three different numbers built on the same lever, adoption rate, stretched across an increasingly generous map. The SAM is grounded in what Lime already sees in its own data. The TAM requires every city it might enter to someday look like its best city today, at total saturation. Somewhere between $6 billion and $69 billion is the real number, and where it lands depends entirely on how many Madrids and Parises show up along the way.

Most micromobility companies sell rides. Lime sells the platform underneath the ride, and the scooter is just where it surfaces.

The visible layer is the fleet itself, e-scooters, e-bikes, and seated e-scooters, deployed across roughly 230 cities. That part looks like every competitor's product. The difference sits underneath, in four systems Lime treats as one platform.

The Rider App is the part anyone sees, the thing that finds the nearest vehicle and runs the trip. Behind it is the Lime Supply App, which runs the half of the business riders never think about: which scooter needs a battery swap, which one needs to move three blocks to where demand actually is. Both apps sit on top of an IoT layer, sensors embedded in every vehicle, continuously reporting location and health back to the system.

Then there's the data, which is less a feature than the thing the other three exist to generate. Every trip feeds demand forecasting and hardware design. And underneath all of it sits the part competitors can't buy off a shelf: a government relations function that turns anonymized trip data into the argument a city needs to hand over a permit.

The scooter is the product riders touch. The platform is the product cities and operators are actually buying.

Lime's business model has two engines, and the second one is what makes the unit economics work.

The first is the per-trip charge. An unlock fee of around a dollar, then per-minute pricing, split across two payment modes. Pay-As-You-Go is 72% of 2025 revenue, the tourist and the first-time rider. LimePass and LimePrime, the subscription side, grew from 20% to 28% of revenue in a single year, and those riders take roughly six times as many trips. The mix shift toward subscription is most of what drove revenue per vehicle per day up 10%.

The second engine is the fleet itself, and how fast it pays for itself. In 2026 a scooter recoups its cost in about a year, then generates cash for four more against a five-year depreciation life. That flip happened because of the swappable battery, introduced in 2020: a worker swaps a charged battery on the street instead of hauling the scooter back to a warehouse overnight. In Paris, miles traveled per maintenance trip fell 87% between 2019 and 2025.

The number that proves it: average fleet grew 18% in 2025, revenue per vehicle per day still rose 10%, and marketing spend stayed under 2% of revenue. Density sells itself. Reliability compounds.

Wayne Ting — Chief Executive Officer and Board Member

Ting has run Lime since May 2020, promoted from Global Head of Operations and Strategy after Uber's $85 million emergency check kept the company alive. Before Lime he was Chief of Staff to Uber's CEO, and before that ran Uber's Northern California operations, meaning his last job before this one was managing the rideshare giant that now sits as Lime's largest shareholder.

Joseph Kraus — President, retiring May 2026

Kraus joined as President in November 2018 from Google Ventures, where he spent nine years as Partner after running product management at Google. He's leaving right as the company goes public, selling about 47,000 shares on the way out.

Ann Gugino — Chief Financial Officer

Gugino has run Lime's finances since December 2023, arriving from the CFO seat at Papa John's. A pizza chain executive now underwrites scooter depreciation schedules.

Lime's cap table tells a survival story more than a growth one. Uber is the largest holder at 21.9% post-IPO, down from 24.4%, having written the $85 million check that kept the company alive in 2020 and locked itself up for two years post-offering. Behind Uber sits Sapphire, an Abu Dhabi vehicle at 15.2% that built its stake by converting a 2021 note rather than writing a fresh check, a continuation of a relationship that started in 2021 when ADQ, Abu Dhabi's state fund, led a $523 million round years before Lime had launched in a single Gulf city. Fidelity holds 10.3%, a16z 4.5%. Stack the top three and roughly 47% sits with Uber, a Gulf-aligned fund, and Fidelity.

Wayne Ting, who ran the turnaround, owns 1.9% after the offering. One class of common stock, one vote per share, no founder super-voting structure. He runs the company entirely at his shareholders' discretion.

The insider selling is light and tells its own story. Ting sells about 99,000 shares, cofounder Brad Bao around 73,000, retiring president Joseph Kraus about 47,000. No institution sells into the deal at all.

So the cap table raises a question opposite the usual IPO skepticism. Nobody here needs liquidity. Uber is buying more, not less. The question isn't who's cashing out. It's whether a balance sheet built to survive 2020 can compound without the next emergency check, or the next sovereign one.

Lime names its competition in two arenas, and the second one is the one that actually decides outcomes.

The first is the obvious field: other scooter operators. Bird and its subsidiary Spin, Bolt, Neuron Mobility, Voi, Dott, HelloRide, plus docked operators like Lyft. Fragmented, low switching costs, and consumers who gravitate to whoever's cheapest or has the most scooters on the corner that day. This is the war Lime is winning on scale, roughly 27% share globally, 37% in the US, nearly three times the next operator.

The second arena is the one that actually gates entry: the permit table. A city runs an RFP, picks one to three operators, and that decision matters more than any feature war. Lime wins about 90% of those bids and renews above 95%, which sounds dominant until you remember the rule cuts both ways. Madrid revoked every operator's permit in 2024. Paris voted the whole industry out in 2023. A city can end the competition for everyone in a single vote, regardless of who was winning it.

So the real competitor isn't Bird or Voi. It's the next city council meeting. Scale wins the RFP. It does nothing once a city decides it doesn't want scooters parked on its sidewalks at all.

Lime's financials are the rare kind in micromobility: hypergrowth and operating profit at the same time. Revenue grew to $886.7M in 2025, up 29%, with Q1 2026 at $170.2M, up 32%. Operating income hit $70.4M, flipping from a $24.6M loss just two years earlier. Adjusted EBITDA reached $218.1M, up 42%, a margin north of 24%.

The number that doesn't behave is the bottom line. Net loss widened to $59.3M in 2025, from $33.9M the year before, even as operating income climbed. The gap sits almost entirely in one line: an $84M non-cash charge from marking the 2021 convertible notes to fair value, the accounting cost of Lime getting more valuable heading into the IPO. It disappears the day the deal prices.

Free cash flow tells a seasonal story rather than a structural one. Full-year 2025 FCF was positive $103.8M, helped by a shift to letters of credit on vehicle purchases. Q1 2026 flipped negative $79.2M, because capex front-loads into the cold-weather hardware refresh while ridership bottoms out in the rain.

And the depreciation change tells you where the next few quarters get easier to read: switching to straight-line in January 2025 already slowed the margin erosion, with more of that benefit still to land.

Lime files one of the more unusual records to reach the public market this year. A company that came within twenty days of running out of cash in 2020, rebuilt entirely under one operator's discipline, and is now asking the public market to underwrite the part of the turnaround that's actually finished.

The bull case is real. Operating income flipped from a $24.6M loss to $70.4M in two years. Marketing under 2% of revenue. A network effect that gets stronger as the fleet grows. A balance sheet that comes out the other side close to debt free.

But here's the verdict: this offering prices two different companies stacked on top of each other. One is an operational turnaround, real and working. The other is a permit business at the mercy of city councils that can end the relationship with a single vote, as Madrid and Paris already proved, and Prague echoed in 2025. None of those alone moved the topline, Madrid was under 1.2% of revenue even at the high end, but three capitals in three years is a pattern the filing itself admits. Adjusted EBITDA of $218M looks cheap at 7x. Strip the adjustment back out and you're paying for a scooter rental company at a price that assumes the discipline never slips, and that a depreciation tailwind still mostly unproven shows up on schedule.

Tom Chi is the Founding Partner at At One Ventures and founding member of Google X, where he led teams creating self-driving cars and Google Glass. A physicist-turned-venture capitalist, he's authored Climate Capital, investing in deep-tech startups helping humanity become net positive to nature—a 200-500 year mission.

If you enjoyed our analysis, we’d very much appreciate you sharing with a friend.

Here are the options I have for us to work together. If any of them are interesting to you - hit me up!

What do you think about my bi-weekly Newsletter? Love it | Okay-ish | Stop it