If you’re building an international team, another company has likely already wrestled with the same questions you’re facing.

Oyster’s events bring together founders, HR leaders, and global employment experts to share what they’re seeing, testing, and learning in the real world.

How do you hire in a new country? When does EOR make sense? How should you approach global compensation? And how do you stay compliant when the rules change from one market to the next?

Come for the insights, stay for the ideas you can actually take back to your team.

Find your next event

👋 Hi, it’s Rohit Malhotra and welcome to the FREE edition of Partner Growth Newsletter, my weekly newsletter doing deep dives into the fastest-growing startups and S1 briefs. Subscribe to join readers who get Partner Growth delivered to their inbox every Wednesday morning.

If you’re new, not yet a subscriber, or just plain missed it, here are some of our recent editions.

_{Interested in sponsoring these emails? See our partnership options here.}

Subscribe to the Life Self Mastery podcast, which guides you on getting funding and allowing your business to grow rocketship. 

Previous guests include Guy Kawasaki, Brad Feld, James Clear, Nick Huber, Shu Nyatta and 350+ incredible guests.

Bending Spoons is on a roll and its' acquisition of Miro is not a distressed sale of a company that ran out of room. It is Luca Ferrari running the same playbook a second time in five weeks - buy a brand the venture market can no longer price, hand back its cash, run it for earnings.

On the surface: a Milan holding company pays $1.355 billion for a whiteboarding tool that raised $476 million across fourteen years and was marked at $17.5 billion in early 2022. Equity value lands at $1.79 billion. Strip the $435 million in the bank and enterprise value falls to $1.355 billion - a quarter of the price was Miro's own account. Against roughly $600 million in ARR, that is 2.3x revenue.

But Miro is not the wreckage of a unicorn. It is the disciplined one. Profitable since 2020. $435 million in cash, 4 million paying users, 750 accounts over $100K, no forced timeline, able to walk. And it cleared 2.3x anyway - below Airtable's price, five weeks later.

That is not a failure. It is the clearing price for a good SaaS company that stopped growing fast. And Bending Spoons - Evernote, WeTransfer, Eventbrite, Vimeo, AOL - is not a software company. It is where the ZIRP unicorn class was always going to meet.

In 2011, Andrey Khusid and Oleg Shardin built a browser whiteboard called RealtimeBoard: an infinite canvas where remote teams could sketch, map, and plan as if standing at the same wall. That became Miro. Fifteen years later, Bending Spoons is paying $1.355 billion for it. The reason isn't the product. It is the install base the pandemic and a decade of cheap capital paid to build.

The asset was priced for a curve that stopped bending. Miro rode remote work from 5 million to 30 million users between 2020 and 2022, took $400 million at a $17.5 billion valuation, then spent four years growing into a number that no longer existed. Two rounds of layoffs. A pivot to an "AI innovation workspace." Today it runs roughly $600 million in ARR across 100 million users and 4 million paying, profitable, with $435 million in the bank.

That is the asset Bending Spoons wants. It doesn't buy for strategic fit. It buys companies the venture market overpriced and can no longer clear: Evernote, WeTransfer, Eventbrite, Vimeo, Airtable. Then it trims staff and runs the thing for cash. At 2.3x ARR, Miro fits the pattern exactly - the second $1B-plus name fed into the machine in five weeks.

Bending Spoons is paying $1.79 billion, all cash, for Miro's equity. Roughly $435 million of that is Miro's own balance sheet, so the price for the business itself falls to $1.355 billion in enterprise value. On roughly $600 million of ARR, that is 2.3x revenue. Not the multiple a category leader with 4 million paying users commands. The multiple a fallen unicorn the venture market can no longer clear settles at.

The number that matters is the one missing. Bending Spoons named the ARR, the paying users, the 750 accounts over $100K. It named no growth rate. No earnout, no milestone, nothing tied to what Miro does next, because Bending Spoons is not underwriting the future. It is underwriting what the asset produces today.

And it did not fund the deal on cash alone. Certain shareholders rolled $295 million, 16% of the equity value, back into newly issued Bending Spoons stock. What it is buying is not a company to scale. It is an install base to run for margin. Trim the staff, streamline the product, harvest the recurring revenue, the way it did with Evernote, WeTransfer, and Vimeo. The AI workspace pivot is not the asset. The 4 million already paying, 90% of them business and enterprise, is.

Three numbers do the explaining here.

One. Bending Spoons is paying 2.3x ARR for a company that ran roughly $420 million in 2022 and around $600 million now - high single digits a year, four years in a row. Set that against January 2022, when Miro took $400 million at $17.5 billion. The company grew into a bigger business and a price about a tenth of the old mark. That gap is not a Miro problem. It is the SaaS repricing made literal. A profitable, disciplined category leader clears 2.3x, which quietly reprices every slower unicorn beneath it toward 1x, or nothing.

Two. The multiple is the whole thesis. No earnout, no AI milestone, no growth rate even disclosed - nothing paid against what comes next. Bending Spoons is underwriting present ARR, roughly $600 million of it, and 4 million paying users, 90% business and enterprise. The AI workspace pivot is not in the price. What it buys is what already recurs.

Three. It funds the deal from cash and $295 million of its own newly issued stock, and buys the asset at a discount to Miro's 2021 marks. The playbook adds margin where venture added burn. The premium isn't for the growth. It is for the recurring revenue the last cycle overpaid to build

$1.79 billion in cash. But $435 million of it is Miro's own balance sheet, coming right back to the buyer. That second number is where the structure starts.

Strip the cash and Bending Spoons is paying $1.355 billion for the business itself. Most acquirers pay for the company and the growth story stacked on top. Bending Spoons refused to pay for the story. No earnout. No AI milestone. No growth rate even named. It paid for the recurring revenue Miro already has and zero for what it might become. That's not caution. It's a verdict.

And this isn't an acquisition to integrate. It's a harvest. Where a strategic buyer dissolves an asset into its platform, Bending Spoons does the opposite ie. it keeps the brand and strips the body. Evernote is still Evernote. WeTransfer is still WeTransfer. Same logo, a fraction of the staff, run for cash. The name survives. The company doesn't.

Funded from cash on hand plus $295 million of Bending Spoons stock that certain Miro shareholders rolled back in ie. 16% of the price returned across the table. The precedent is Vimeo ie. bought for $1.38 billion in 2025, folded in as a brand, run for margin.

From the operator's seat, this is not a gamble. It is arithmetic.

Bending Spoons is buying $600 million of ARR that is already profitable, 90% of it business and enterprise, at 2.3x. The install base does the work. A whiteboard wired into 250 integrations - GitHub, Jira, Slack - and 750 accounts over $100K does not churn on a price change. Matteo Danieli says retention held through every prior integration. That is the bet: the revenue stays while the cost base comes out.

And the cost base comes out hard. Ferrari says 90% of Bending Spoons' code is now written by AI. WeTransfer lost roughly 75% of staff within weeks of close. Evernote's price went from about $100 to $249. Net cash from operations was $291 million in 2025. Run Miro the same way and the payback on $1.355 billion of enterprise value is measured in a few years of margin, not a decade of growth.

No earnout means no exposure to the future. The operator underwrites only what recurs today. Around 1,000 more targets already identified. This is not one acquisition. It is a factory, and Miro is the biggest unit yet on the line.

Bending Spoons is wagering on four things being true at once.

One. The SaaS repricing is permanent, not a dip. Multiples have compressed and stayed compressed, and agents let companies roll their own software now. Bending Spoons is betting Miro was never getting back to its $17.5 billion mark, which is why it paid 2.3x ARR and not a cent for the recovery.

Two. Buying beats building, every time. It didn't write a whiteboard. It bought 4 million paying users and 750 accounts over $100K already inside one. It is betting a paying install base is worth more than any product it could ship itself.

Three. Harvest beats growth. Miro doesn't get scaled; it gets trimmed, streamlined, and run for margin, the way Evernote and Vimeo were. Bending Spoons is betting the money is in operating discipline, not the next feature.

Four. The machine beats the pick. This isn't one clever deal. It is the same playbook run twice in five weeks, funded from cash. It is betting the ZIRP unicorn class becomes a decade of inventory ie. that there are dozens more Miros coming, and it owns the assembly line that eats them.

Miro carried over a thousand staff into this. On every prior Bending Spoons deal, most of them don't survive the year - WeTransfer lost roughly 75% within weeks, Vimeo was cut months after close. Vested equity converts to a check at $1.79 billion. The job is the cost the model takes out.

Late money loses next. The $400 million that came in at $17.5 billion in January 2022 is 22% of the entire equity value the company just sold for. That round bought a mark, not a return. Early investors who priced Miro as a whiteboard, not a $17.5 billion platform, are the only ones who clear a real multiple.

Users lose on the schedule Bending Spoons always runs. Evernote went from about $100 to $249 and gutted its free tier. WeTransfer capped its free plan. The 96% of Miro's 100 million users who never paid are the tier that gets squeezed first.

And the SaaS class beneath Miro loses. A profitable, disciplined category leader clearing 2.3x reprices every slower unicorn under it. If Miro is worth a tenth of its 2021 mark, the ones that never got profitable are worth less.

Three threads worth pulling.

One. Bending Spoons just proved a repeatable playbook for dead unicorns. Buy a fallen 2021 name at a discount to its last mark, fund it from cash, strip it, run it for margin. It has run this on Evernote, WeTransfer, Eventbrite, Vimeo, and now Airtable and Miro inside five weeks. The signal isn't Miro. It's that a public company can build a business out of harvesting the last cycle's mistakes, with 1,000 more targets already named. Watch who copies the model.

Two. The venture market and the acquisition market have decoupled. Miro was marked at $17.5 billion privately and exits at $1.355 billion. What VCs paid for growth, buyers now refuse to pay for at all. The signal is bigger than one deal: private marks and clearing prices are no longer the same number. Watch how many 2021 unicorns quietly reset before they sell.

Three. AI upside is being priced at zero in the deals that matter. Bending Spoons paid full value for Miro's recurring revenue and nothing for the AI workspace pivot. No earnout, no milestone, no growth rate even disclosed. The story that raised the last round bought none of the exit. Watch how many acquirers in 2026 do the same ie. pay for what recurs, ignore what's promised.

The bull case. Bending Spoons bought $600 million in profitable ARR and 4 million paying users, 90% of them business and enterprise, for 2.3x, funded from cash and its own paper. Trim the staff, run it for margin, and the machine that worked on Evernote and Vimeo works again at scale.

The bear case. It paid full price for the present and nothing for the future, which means there is no future in the model, only a slow harvest of what already exists. Miro grew into $600 million and a price a tenth of its old mark. Own the recurring revenue, strip the rest, and you hold a melting asset, not a compounding one. Bending Spoons is betting operating discipline outlasts the decline. It usually does, until it doesn't.

What to watch: this was the second buy in five weeks. One fallen unicorn is a deal. A pipeline of them is a thesis. The buys keep coming, so the repricing is real ie. and permanent.

Here is my interview with Raphaël Boukris, co-founder and CRO of Didomi. Roughly 2% of global web traffic runs through their SDK. He's raised three rounds, made two acquisitions, and sold majority control to private equity. Now the group does 40 to 60m ARR with under 200 people.

If you enjoyed our analysis, we’d very much appreciate you sharing with a friend.

Here are the options I have for us to work together. If any of them are interesting to you - hit me up!

And that’s it from me. See you next week.

What do you think about my bi-weekly Newsletter? Love it | Okay-ish | Stop it