👋 Hi, it’s Rohit Malhotra and welcome to the FREE edition of Partner Growth Newsletter, my weekly newsletter doing deep dives into the fastest-growing startups and S1 briefs. Subscribe to join readers who get Partner Growth delivered to their inbox every Wednesday morning.

If you’re new, not yet a subscriber, or just plain missed it, here are some of our recent editions.

AI is moving from experiment… to essential.

Every major industry is integrating it.
Every major company is investing in it.

By late 2025, AI was already an $800B market — growing at a pace that could push it well beyond $1 trillion in the years ahead.

Cloud infrastructure is scaling fast.
AI-enabled devices are multiplying.
Automation is becoming standard.

But here’s the real question…

When trillions flow into this transformation — which stocks stand to benefit most?

Our new report reveals 10 AI stocks positioned across the backbone of this shift — from the companies powering the infrastructure… to those embedding intelligence into everyday systems.

If you want exposure to one of the defining growth trends of this decade, start here.

Download the Report Now

_{Interested in sponsoring these emails? See our partnership options here.}

Subscribe to the Life Self Mastery podcast, which guides you on getting funding and allowing your business to grow rocketship. 

Previous guests include Guy Kawasaki, Brad Feld, James Clear, Nick Huber, Shu Nyatta and 350+ incredible guests.

SpaceX acquiring Cursor is not about AI coding. It is a structural move from a company that realized Wall Street will not pay AI multiples for a satellite business, and decided the fastest path to AI relevance was buying the fastest growing product in the category.

On the surface: the world's most valuable private company taking a $60 billion option on the breakout AI coding startup. A capability acquisition. A pre-IPO positioning play. The kind of deal that gets filed under "Musk being Musk" and forgotten by the next launch.

Look closer, and the logic gets sharper.

Cursor was days away from closing a $2 billion round at a $50 billion valuation, with Andreessen Horowitz, Thrive, Nvidia, and Battery Ventures already committed. The company has been outgrowing every other application layer AI business despite fierce competition from Anthropic's Claude Code and OpenAI's Codex.

SpaceX, fresh off its xAI merger, still lacked a meaningful AI workforce. What it had was vast compute sitting across data centers in Mississippi and Tennessee, an IPO coming this summer, and a problem: public markets were going to price it as a space company unless something changed.

So instead of building AI coding from scratch while Anthropic and OpenAI consolidated the category, SpaceX wrote a $60 billion option and a $10 billion consolation prize. The deal closes after the IPO. The signal lands now.

Cursor was running two processes at once. While its team finalized a $2 billion funding round at a $50 billion valuation — with Andreessen Horowitz, Thrive, Nvidia, and Battery Ventures already on the cap table — it was simultaneously negotiating an acquisition with SpaceX. The funding round was set to close this week. SpaceX moved first.

The parallel track was not a hedge. It was a necessity. Even at $50 billion, the $2 billion raise would have fallen short of what Cursor needs to reach cash flow breakeven. The company would have been back in the market within 18 months, raising into a category that is consolidating fast and pricing in compression.

The competitive picture explains the urgency. Cursor has been the breakout product of the AI coding category, but the moat is getting tested in real time. Anthropic's Claude Code is gaining ground with developers who want a model-native experience. OpenAI's Codex is back and integrated into the ChatGPT surface millions already use daily. Both competitors own the underlying models. Cursor does not. Every dollar of Cursor's revenue flows partially back to the labs whose products are now competing with it directly.

Against that backdrop, a $60 billion exit option from a buyer with infinite compute and zero AI revenue to protect was not a distraction from the funding round. It was the better deal. SpaceX understood this, and structured the offer accordingly.

Here is what makes the structure interesting. SpaceX is not buying Cursor outright. It is buying an option to buy Cursor for $60 billion, with a $10 billion collaboration payment that triggers regardless of whether the acquisition closes. The deal is contingent on SpaceX's IPO this summer, structured to be financed in public stock rather than cash, and timed to avoid amending confidential filings before the listing. The question is not what SpaceX paid. The question is what other path SpaceX had to becoming an AI company before its IPO priced.

The timeline tells the story.

2022: Michael Truell, Sualeh Asif, Arvid Lunnemark, and Aman Sanger incorporate Anysphere while still at MIT. They raise a $400K pre-seed. The thesis is contrarian. Existing AI coding tools are bolt-ons. The right answer is forking VS Code and rebuilding the editor with AI at the core.

March 2023: Cursor launches.

October 2023: $8 million seed led by the OpenAI Startup Fund. Nat Friedman and Arash Ferdowsi join as angels.

2024: $60 million Series A at a $400 million valuation. By year end, Benchmark and Index Ventures are bidding the company up to $2.5 billion.

January 2025: Cursor hits $100 million ARR in 14 months. Fastest SaaS company in history to that milestone.

June 2025: $900 million round led by Thrive Capital, Andreessen Horowitz, Accel, and DST at a $9.9 billion valuation.

November 2025: $2.3 billion Series D co-led by Accel and Coatue at $29.3 billion. ARR crosses $1 billion. Google and Nvidia join the cap table as strategic investors.

Early 2026: Cursor goes back to market. The new round is structured at $50 billion. Andreessen Horowitz, Thrive, Nvidia, and Battery Ventures commit. Close is set for late April.

April 21, 2026: SpaceX announces the deal hours before the funding round was set to close. $60 billion acquisition option. $10 billion collaboration payment if it does not exercise. Financial terms beyond that are not disclosed.

But here is what SpaceX actually bought.

The category leader. Cursor is not one of several AI coding products. It is the breakout. Over a million daily active users. Half the Fortune 500. $1 billion in ARR built on word of mouth, not paid acquisition. AI coding is currently the most monetizable application layer in AI, and SpaceX bought the company most likely to capture that surface before Anthropic and OpenAI consolidated around it.

The intact team. Google's Windsurf deal was an acqui-hire. The product was abandoned. The team was split. SpaceX has no competing AI coding product to fold this into and no meaningful AI workforce of its own to defend. Every Cursor engineer who stays is a net add. The xAI merger gave SpaceX a frontier model. It did not give SpaceX an AI product organization that ships to a million paying users a day. That is what Cursor brings.

The narrative for the IPO. SpaceX wants to be priced like an AI company, not a satellite company. The Cursor announcement, made weeks before the IPO roadshow, is the cleanest possible signal to public investors that AI is a durable line of business inside SpaceX. Even if the acquisition never closes, the $10 billion collaboration payment buys the right to tell that story to Wall Street while the multiple is still being set.

Three things, each worth more than the headline suggests.

A revenue line. SpaceX is a launch and satellite business with one of the most capital intensive cost structures in the world. Cursor brings $1 billion in high margin software ARR growing at the fastest rate any SaaS business has ever recorded. Public markets price that revenue stream at a different multiple than launch contracts. The $60 billion is not the cost. It is the down payment on a category change.

Compute monetization. SpaceX has data center capacity in Mississippi and Tennessee that it can route to Cursor in lieu of part of the $10 billion collaboration payment. Cursor has the opposite problem. Massive inference demand, no infrastructure of its own, and margin constrained by what it pays third party labs. Internalizing Cursor's compute workload turns a cost center into an internal customer.

A product org that ships. The xAI merger gave SpaceX a frontier model and a research team. It did not give SpaceX a product organization shipping to a million paying users a day. Cursor is the missing layer between model and customer, and the part xAI was never built to provide.

Three things, each more valuable than the funding round it replaced.

A floor. The $2 billion round at $50 billion was a vote of confidence, but it was also a ceiling. Even with that capital, Cursor was 18 months from being back in market, raising into a category that is consolidating fast and pricing in compression. The SpaceX deal puts a $10 billion floor under the company regardless of what happens next. If the acquisition closes, Cursor sells at $60 billion. If it does not, Cursor still gets a $10 billion capital injection paid out over time. Both outcomes are better than the round it walked away from.

Compute that does not flow back to a competitor. Every dollar Cursor spends on inference today partially funds Anthropic and OpenAI, the two labs whose products are now competing with it directly. SpaceX compute breaks that loop. Cursor gets capacity at near-cost from a partner with no model layer ambitions of its own.

An exit path if the category compresses. AI coding is the most lucrative application of the technology right now. It is also the most contested. The $60 billion option is insurance against the version of the future where Claude Code and Codex collapse the standalone editor category.

This deal sends three messages worth reading carefully.

The application layer is no longer safe at any valuation. Cursor was the breakout. $1 billion ARR. A million daily users. The fastest growth curve in SaaS history. Even at $29 billion, it could not raise enough capital to outrun the model labs that supply it. If Cursor cannot stay independent, the bar for any AI application layer startup raising at $5 billion or $10 billion just got harder to clear. The model layer collects rent on the way up. On the way down, it competes for the same customers.

The "AI company" premium is now a balance sheet line item. SpaceX is not paying $60 billion for code completion. It is paying for a multiple repricing on the public side of its IPO. Public markets are valuing AI revenue at three to four times what they pay for everything else. The cheapest path to an AI valuation is not building it. It is buying a category leader weeks before the roadshow. Expect every pre-IPO company with cash and a story problem to run a version of this play.

Parallel processes are now the default. Cursor was hours from closing $2 billion when SpaceX moved. That is not a coincidence. It is the new shape of late-stage AI deal-making. If you are raising and the round is real, expect the acquisition conversation on the same timeline. The two questions have become one question.

The SpaceX deal will get filed under Musk M&A. It belongs in a different category.

This is not a space company adding an AI capability. It is the moment a pre-IPO giant formally acknowledged that public markets will not pay an AI multiple unless an AI business is on the balance sheet. The launch contracts, the satellite revenue, the cost structure that took two decades to build, none of that gets repriced upward without an AI line item the size of Cursor sitting next to it.

The application layer startups that built category leadership early are getting bought by the buyers that need them. The ones that waited are now raising into a market where the model labs compete with them directly and the strategic acquirers have already paired off.

For the broader AI industry, the signal is unambiguous. The capital markets premium on AI revenue is no longer something founders can ignore on the way to an IPO. It is something acquirers are now willing to spend $60 billion to manufacture, weeks before the roadshow, in front of public investors who will price it accordingly.

SpaceX did not acquire Cursor because it wanted to be in coding. It acquired Cursor because it could not afford to find out what going public as a satellite company looked like.

Here is my interview with Or Dagan, the Chief Product & Strategy Officer at AI21 Labs, where he leads product, strategy, and the development of enterprise AI systems including Maestro, their AI planning and orchestration platform.

If you enjoyed our analysis, we’d very much appreciate you sharing with a friend.

Here are the options I have for us to work together. If any of them are interesting to you - hit me up!

And that’s it from me. See you next week.

What do you think about my bi-weekly Newsletter? Love it | Okay-ish | Stop it